Alabama moves to expand police immunity, sparking backlash

Civil rights groups protest Alabama bill shielding police from courts

Robert Besser
04 Mar 2025, 11:55 GMT+10

Alabama moves to expand police immunity, sparking backlash

A new bill in Alabama would give police officers more legal protection if they use excessive force or kill someone while on duty
The bill has moved forward in the state legislature, sparking criticism from civil rights activists who say it would make it nearly impossible to prosecute officers
Supporters of the bill argue that it will help recruit and retain officers and improve their safety. Currently, both police and civilians can use a “stand your ground” defense in criminal cases

MONTGOMERY, Alabama: A new bill in Alabama would give police officers more legal protection if they use excessive force or kill someone while on duty.

The bill has moved forward in the state legislature, sparking criticism from civil rights activists who say it would make it nearly impossible to prosecute officers.

Supporters of the bill argue that it will help recruit and retain officers and improve their safety. Currently, both police and civilians can use a "stand your ground" defense in criminal cases. The bill would add another step for officers, allowing a judge to decide if they should be immune from prosecution before a trial begins. Even if immunity is denied, officers can argue for it again in front of a jury.

Police officers already have some legal protection from civil lawsuits. The bill would further limit liability, making it harder to sue officers unless they acted recklessly beyond their duties.

Critics, like Norma Sanders from the Lee County NAACP, say this will make it even harder to hold officers accountable for misconduct.

The bill is part of a crime package backed by Governor Kay Ivey. Republican Rep. Rex Reynolds, who introduced the bill, says it ensures officers feel confident making split-second decisions. However, opponents argue it will prevent officers from facing consequences, further damaging public trust in law enforcement.